Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial
- DOI
- 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912
- Published
- 2021-12-16
- Container
- Chinese Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912,
title = {Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial},
author = {Yongjun Liu and Xiangyou Yu and Duming Zhu and Jun Zeng and Qinhan Lin and Bin Zang and Chuanxi Chen and Ning Liu and Xiao Liu and Wei Gao and Xiangdong Guan},
year = {2021},
journal = {Chinese Medical Journal},
doi = {10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial AU - Yongjun Liu AU - Xiangyou Yu AU - Duming Zhu AU - Jun Zeng AU - Qinhan Lin AU - Bin Zang AU - Chuanxi Chen AU - Ning Liu AU - Xiao Liu AU - Wei Gao AU - Xiangdong Guan PY - 2021 JO - Chinese Medical Journal DO - 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912 ER -
APA
Liu, Y., Yu, X., Zhu, D., Zeng, J., Lin, Q., Zang, B., Chen, C., Liu, N., Liu, X., Gao, W., & Guan, X. (2021). Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial. Chinese Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000001912
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T06:22:40.903Z