Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
- DOI
- 10.1097/crd.0000000000001349
- Published
- 2026 Jun 18
- Container
- Cardiology in review
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/crd.0000000000001349,
title = {Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.},
author = {Balach R and Khalid A and Qadri FH and Zafar A and Ahmed M and Rahman MF and Daniyal SM and Ahmad A and Musani MH},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cardiology in review},
doi = {10.1097/crd.0000000000001349},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001349}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. AU - Balach R AU - Khalid A AU - Qadri FH AU - Zafar A AU - Ahmed M AU - Rahman MF AU - Daniyal SM AU - Ahmad A AU - Musani MH PY - 2026 JO - Cardiology in review DO - 10.1097/crd.0000000000001349 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001349 ER -
APA
R, B., A, K., FH, Q., A, Z., M, A., MF, R., SM, D., A, A., & MH, M. (2026). Endoscopic Versus Open Radial Artery Harvesting in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Cardiology in review. https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001349
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T08:23:16.321Z