Long-Term Outcomes With Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sayed MS, Gadelmawla AF, Atta K, Madyan AM, Shaheen RS, Soliman EM, Elbana HH, Ahmed AH, Abdelazeem B, Jhand A, Elgendy IY

Open source

DOI
10.1097/crd.0000000000001388
Published
2026 Jul 28
Container
Cardiology in review
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/crd.0000000000001388,
  title = {Long-Term Outcomes With Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.},
  author = {Sayed MS and Gadelmawla AF and Atta K and Madyan AM and Shaheen RS and Soliman EM and Elbana HH and Ahmed AH and Abdelazeem B and Jhand A and Elgendy IY},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Cardiology in review},
  doi = {10.1097/crd.0000000000001388},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001388}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Long-Term Outcomes With Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
AU  - Sayed MS
AU  - Gadelmawla AF
AU  - Atta K
AU  - Madyan AM
AU  - Shaheen RS
AU  - Soliman EM
AU  - Elbana HH
AU  - Ahmed AH
AU  - Abdelazeem B
AU  - Jhand A
AU  - Elgendy IY
PY  - 2026
JO  - Cardiology in review
DO  - 10.1097/crd.0000000000001388
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001388
ER  - 

APA

MS, S., AF, G., K, A., AM, M., RS, S., EM, S., HH, E., AH, A., B, A., A, J., & IY, E. (2026). Long-Term Outcomes With Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Cardiology in review. https://doi.org/10.1097/crd.0000000000001388

Source records