Comparison of adequacy of anaesthesia monitoring with standard clinical practice monitoring during routine general anaesthesia
- DOI
- 10.1097/eja.0000000000001357
- Published
- 2020-10-16
- Container
- European Journal of Anaesthesiology
- Publisher
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/eja.0000000000001357,
title = {Comparison of adequacy of anaesthesia monitoring with standard clinical practice monitoring during routine general anaesthesia},
author = {Matthias Gruenewald and Jarkko Harju and Benedikt Preckel and Zsolt Molnár and Arvi Yli-Hankala and Florian Rosskopf and Lena Koers and Agnes Orban and Berthold Bein},
year = {2020},
journal = {European Journal of Anaesthesiology},
doi = {10.1097/eja.0000000000001357},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001357}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of adequacy of anaesthesia monitoring with standard clinical practice monitoring during routine general anaesthesia AU - Matthias Gruenewald AU - Jarkko Harju AU - Benedikt Preckel AU - Zsolt Molnár AU - Arvi Yli-Hankala AU - Florian Rosskopf AU - Lena Koers AU - Agnes Orban AU - Berthold Bein PY - 2020 JO - European Journal of Anaesthesiology DO - 10.1097/eja.0000000000001357 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001357 ER -
APA
Gruenewald, M., Harju, J., Preckel, B., Molnár, Z., Yli-Hankala, A., Rosskopf, F., Koers, L., Orban, A., & Bein, B. (2020). Comparison of adequacy of anaesthesia monitoring with standard clinical practice monitoring during routine general anaesthesia. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001357
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T00:01:40.345Z