Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Options After Abdominoplasty: Lumbar Artery Perforator Versus Profunda Artery Perforator

Sumeet S. Teotia, Thomas C. Troia, Lauren J. Kim, Nicholas T. Haddock

Open source

DOI
10.1097/gox.0000000000007332
Published
2025-12
Container
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/gox.0000000000007332,
  title = {Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Options After Abdominoplasty: Lumbar Artery Perforator Versus Profunda Artery Perforator},
  author = {Sumeet S. Teotia and Thomas C. Troia and Lauren J. Kim and Nicholas T. Haddock},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open},
  doi = {10.1097/gox.0000000000007332},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000007332}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Options After Abdominoplasty: Lumbar Artery Perforator Versus Profunda Artery Perforator
AU  - Sumeet S. Teotia
AU  - Thomas C. Troia
AU  - Lauren J. Kim
AU  - Nicholas T. Haddock
PY  - 2025
JO  - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
DO  - 10.1097/gox.0000000000007332
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000007332
ER  - 

APA

Teotia, S. S., Troia, T. C., Kim, L. J., & Haddock, N. T. (2025). Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Options After Abdominoplasty: Lumbar Artery Perforator Versus Profunda Artery Perforator. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000007332

Source records