OpenEvidence versus Six Leading Large Language Models in Refractive Surgery: Does Curated Medical Evidence Confer an Advantage?

Wallerstein A, Gallant M, Gauvin M

Open source

DOI
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088
Published
2026 Oct 26
Container
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088,
  title = {OpenEvidence versus Six Leading Large Language Models in Refractive Surgery: Does Curated Medical Evidence Confer an Advantage?},
  author = {Wallerstein A and Gallant M and Gauvin M},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of cataract and refractive surgery},
  doi = {10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - OpenEvidence versus Six Leading Large Language Models in Refractive Surgery: Does Curated Medical Evidence Confer an Advantage?
AU  - Wallerstein A
AU  - Gallant M
AU  - Gauvin M
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
DO  - 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088
ER  - 

APA

A, W., M, G., & M, G. (2026). OpenEvidence versus Six Leading Large Language Models in Refractive Surgery: Does Curated Medical Evidence Confer an Advantage?. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002088

Source records