To Compare the Effects of a Standard Versus Hydrophilic Polymer Coated Airway Stent in a Porcine Model: A Randomized, Single-Blinded Study.

Cho RJ, Kadowaki K, Seelig D, Glumac DE, Kent LA, Hunter RC, MacIver RH, Peterson GK, Pandey V, Tanahashi K.

Open source

DOI
10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934
Published
2024-04-01
Container
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934,
  title = {To Compare the Effects of a Standard Versus Hydrophilic Polymer Coated Airway Stent in a Porcine Model: A Randomized, Single-Blinded Study.},
  author = {Cho RJ and  Kadowaki K and  Seelig D and  Glumac DE and  Kent LA and  Hunter RC and  MacIver RH and  Peterson GK and  Pandey V and  Tanahashi K.},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol},
  doi = {10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - To Compare the Effects of a Standard Versus Hydrophilic Polymer Coated Airway Stent in a Porcine Model: A Randomized, Single-Blinded Study.
AU  - Cho RJ
AU  -  Kadowaki K
AU  -  Seelig D
AU  -  Glumac DE
AU  -  Kent LA
AU  -  Hunter RC
AU  -  MacIver RH
AU  -  Peterson GK
AU  -  Pandey V
AU  -  Tanahashi K.
PY  - 2024
JO  - J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
DO  - 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934
ER  - 

APA

RJ, C., K, K., D, S., DE, G., LA, K., RC, H., RH, M., GK, P., V, P., & K., T. (2024). To Compare the Effects of a Standard Versus Hydrophilic Polymer Coated Airway Stent in a Porcine Model: A Randomized, Single-Blinded Study.. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. https://doi.org/10.1097/lbr.0000000000000934

Source records