Optical coherence tomography versus angiography alone for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.

Emara A, Mansour A, Doma M, Alaswad K, Brilakis ES, Megaly M

DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000001656
Published: 2026 Sep 1
Container: Coronary artery disease
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/mca.0000000000001656,
  title = {Optical coherence tomography versus angiography alone for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.},
  author = {Emara A and Mansour A and Doma M and Alaswad K and Brilakis ES and Megaly M},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Coronary artery disease},
  doi = {10.1097/mca.0000000000001656},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0000000000001656}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optical coherence tomography versus angiography alone for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.
AU  - Emara A
AU  - Mansour A
AU  - Doma M
AU  - Alaswad K
AU  - Brilakis ES
AU  - Megaly M
PY  - 2026
JO  - Coronary artery disease
DO  - 10.1097/mca.0000000000001656
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0000000000001656
ER  -

APA

A, E., A, M., M, D., K, A., ES, B., & M, M. (2026). Optical coherence tomography versus angiography alone for guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.. Coronary artery disease. https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0000000000001656

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:31:19.827Z