Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about sepsis.
- DOI
- 10.1097/md.0000000000051114
- Published
- 2026 Oct 23
- Container
- Medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/md.0000000000051114,
title = {Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about sepsis.},
author = {Ömür Arça D and Erdemir İ and Ertürk Şafak F and Kabakçı Gök C and Kara Doğan SN and Odacıoğlu M and Oltulu Kılınç M and Yılmaz Hancı S and Hancı V},
year = {2026},
journal = {Medicine},
doi = {10.1097/md.0000000000051114},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051114}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about sepsis. AU - Ömür Arça D AU - Erdemir İ AU - Ertürk Şafak F AU - Kabakçı Gök C AU - Kara Doğan SN AU - Odacıoğlu M AU - Oltulu Kılınç M AU - Yılmaz Hancı S AU - Hancı V PY - 2026 JO - Medicine DO - 10.1097/md.0000000000051114 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051114 ER -
APA
D, Ö. A., İ, E., F, E. Ş., C, K. G., SN, K. D., M, O., M, O. K., S, Y. H., & V, H. (2026). Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about sepsis.. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051114
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:45:52.665Z