Underwater versus conventional polypectomy for colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- DOI
- 10.1097/meg.0000000000003288
- Published
- 2026 Sep 22
- Container
- European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/meg.0000000000003288,
title = {Underwater versus conventional polypectomy for colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.},
author = {Amdetsion GY and Pan CW and Ojemolon P and Vikash F and Tebeje HG and Abegunde AT},
year = {2026},
journal = {European journal of gastroenterology \& hepatology},
doi = {10.1097/meg.0000000000003288},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000003288}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Underwater versus conventional polypectomy for colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. AU - Amdetsion GY AU - Pan CW AU - Ojemolon P AU - Vikash F AU - Tebeje HG AU - Abegunde AT PY - 2026 JO - European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology DO - 10.1097/meg.0000000000003288 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000003288 ER -
APA
GY, A., CW, P., P, O., F, V., HG, T., & AT, A. (2026). Underwater versus conventional polypectomy for colorectal polyps 10 mm or smaller: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000003288
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:02:43.333Z