Surgical techniques that improve urinary continence and sexual outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a narrative review

Pushan Prabhakar, Jaya Krishnan, Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub, Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Dheeraj Lalwani, Diya Ramasamy, Manuel Ozambela, Murugesan Manoharan

Open source

DOI
10.1097/mou.0000000000001448
Published
2026-09-11
Container
Current Opinion in Urology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/mou.0000000000001448,
  title = {Surgical techniques that improve urinary continence and sexual outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a narrative review},
  author = {Pushan Prabhakar and Jaya Krishnan and Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub and Deerush Kannan Sakthivel and Dheeraj Lalwani and Diya Ramasamy and Manuel Ozambela and Murugesan Manoharan},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Current Opinion in Urology},
  doi = {10.1097/mou.0000000000001448},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000001448}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Surgical techniques that improve urinary continence and sexual outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a narrative review
AU  - Pushan Prabhakar
AU  - Jaya Krishnan
AU  - Mohamed Javid Raja Iyub
AU  - Deerush Kannan Sakthivel
AU  - Dheeraj Lalwani
AU  - Diya Ramasamy
AU  - Manuel Ozambela
AU  - Murugesan Manoharan
PY  - 2026
JO  - Current Opinion in Urology
DO  - 10.1097/mou.0000000000001448
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000001448
ER  - 

APA

Prabhakar, P., Krishnan, J., Iyub, M. J. R., Sakthivel, D. K., Lalwani, D., Ramasamy, D., Ozambela, M., & Manoharan, M. (2026). Surgical techniques that improve urinary continence and sexual outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a narrative review. Current Opinion in Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000001448

Source records