Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
- DOI
- 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Container
- Pancreas
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217,
title = {Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.},
author = {Ramesh J and Bang JY and Hebert-Magee S and Trevino J and Eltoum I and Frost A and Hasan MK and Logue A and Hawes R and Varadarajulu S.},
year = {2015},
journal = {Pancreas},
doi = {10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions. AU - Ramesh J AU - Bang JY AU - Hebert-Magee S AU - Trevino J AU - Eltoum I AU - Frost A AU - Hasan MK AU - Logue A AU - Hawes R AU - Varadarajulu S. PY - 2015 JO - Pancreas DO - 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217 ER -
APA
J, R., JY, B., S, H., J, T., I, E., A, F., MK, H., A, L., R, H., & S., V. (2015). Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.. Pancreas. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000217
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:24:13.886Z