Locked plate constructs are not necessarily stiffer than nonlocked constructs: A biomechanical investigation of locked versus nonlocked diaphyseal fixation in a human cadaveric model of nonosteoporotic and osteoporotic distal femoral fractures.
- DOI
- 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308
- Published
- 2024 Jun
- Container
- OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308,
title = {Locked plate constructs are not necessarily stiffer than nonlocked constructs: A biomechanical investigation of locked versus nonlocked diaphyseal fixation in a human cadaveric model of nonosteoporotic and osteoporotic distal femoral fractures.},
author = {Ricci WM and Dvorzhinskiy A and Zheng Y and Walker Z and Anthony M and Holbrook J and Jones B and Cartner J and Tornetta P 3rd},
year = {2024},
journal = {OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma},
doi = {10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Locked plate constructs are not necessarily stiffer than nonlocked constructs: A biomechanical investigation of locked versus nonlocked diaphyseal fixation in a human cadaveric model of nonosteoporotic and osteoporotic distal femoral fractures. AU - Ricci WM AU - Dvorzhinskiy A AU - Zheng Y AU - Walker Z AU - Anthony M AU - Holbrook J AU - Jones B AU - Cartner J AU - Tornetta P 3rd PY - 2024 JO - OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma DO - 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308 ER -
APA
WM, R., A, D., Y, Z., Z, W., M, A., J, H., B, J., J, C., & 3rd, T. P. (2024). Locked plate constructs are not necessarily stiffer than nonlocked constructs: A biomechanical investigation of locked versus nonlocked diaphyseal fixation in a human cadaveric model of nonosteoporotic and osteoporotic distal femoral fractures.. OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/oi9.0000000000000308
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:20:37.993Z