How Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Compares to Traditional Simulation: A Qualitative Investigation of Pediatric Resident Perceptions.
- DOI
- 10.1097/pec.0000000000003682
- Published
- 2026 Aug 28
- Container
- Pediatric emergency care
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/pec.0000000000003682,
title = {How Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Compares to Traditional Simulation: A Qualitative Investigation of Pediatric Resident Perceptions.},
author = {Tashjian ME and Woods JM and Kiger ME and Higgins JR and Dillon M and Flood SM},
year = {2026},
journal = {Pediatric emergency care},
doi = {10.1097/pec.0000000000003682},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003682}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Compares to Traditional Simulation: A Qualitative Investigation of Pediatric Resident Perceptions. AU - Tashjian ME AU - Woods JM AU - Kiger ME AU - Higgins JR AU - Dillon M AU - Flood SM PY - 2026 JO - Pediatric emergency care DO - 10.1097/pec.0000000000003682 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003682 ER -
APA
ME, T., JM, W., ME, K., JR, H., M, D., & SM, F. (2026). How Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Compares to Traditional Simulation: A Qualitative Investigation of Pediatric Resident Perceptions.. Pediatric emergency care. https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003682
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:15:45.446Z