Comparison of Spinal Accessory Nerve Transfer versus C5 Grafting for Suprascapular Nerve Reinnervation in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

Qifeng Ou, Ding Pan

Open source

DOI
10.1097/prs.0000000000013473
Published
2026-09-25
Container
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1097/prs.0000000000013473,
  title = {Comparison of Spinal Accessory Nerve Transfer versus C5 Grafting for Suprascapular Nerve Reinnervation in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury},
  author = {Qifeng Ou and Ding Pan},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Plastic \& Reconstructive Surgery},
  doi = {10.1097/prs.0000000000013473},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013473}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Spinal Accessory Nerve Transfer versus C5 Grafting for Suprascapular Nerve Reinnervation in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury
AU  - Qifeng Ou
AU  - Ding Pan
PY  - 2026
JO  - Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
DO  - 10.1097/prs.0000000000013473
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013473
ER  - 

APA

Ou, Q., & Pan, D. (2026). Comparison of Spinal Accessory Nerve Transfer versus C5 Grafting for Suprascapular Nerve Reinnervation in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000013473

Source records