Comparison of Early and Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Which is Better? A Multicentered Study: Retracted
- DOI
- 10.1097/sle.0000000000000345
- Published
- 2016-12
- Container
- Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
- Publisher
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
serious concern Score 29/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/sle.0000000000000345,
title = {Comparison of Early and Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Which is Better? A Multicentered Study: Retracted},
author = {Erdal Uysal and Kadir Serkan Turel and Mesut Sipahi and Ozgen Isik and Nimet Yilmaz and Fatih A. Yilmaz},
year = {2016},
journal = {Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy \& Percutaneous Techniques},
doi = {10.1097/sle.0000000000000345},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000345}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Early and Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Which is Better? A Multicentered Study: Retracted AU - Erdal Uysal AU - Kadir Serkan Turel AU - Mesut Sipahi AU - Ozgen Isik AU - Nimet Yilmaz AU - Fatih A. Yilmaz PY - 2016 JO - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques DO - 10.1097/sle.0000000000000345 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000345 ER -
APA
Uysal, E., Turel, K. S., Sipahi, M., Isik, O., Yilmaz, N., & Yilmaz, F. A. (2016). Comparison of Early and Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis. Which is Better? A Multicentered Study: Retracted. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. https://doi.org/10.1097/sle.0000000000000345
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:16:49.892Z