A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141
- Published
- 2018-12-01
- Container
- Int J Evid Based Healthc
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141,
title = {A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.},
author = {Furuya-Kanamori L and Barendregt JJ and Doi SAR.},
year = {2018},
journal = {Int J Evid Based Healthc},
doi = {10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. AU - Furuya-Kanamori L AU - Barendregt JJ AU - Doi SAR. PY - 2018 JO - Int J Evid Based Healthc DO - 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141 ER -
APA
L, F., JJ, B., & SAR., D. (2018). A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.. Int J Evid Based Healthc. https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:53:51.037Z