Did AI get more negative recently?

Dominik Beese, Begüm Altunbaş, Görkem Güzeler, Steffen Eger

Open source

DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221159
Published: 2023-03
Container: Royal Society Open Science
Publisher: The Royal Society
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1098/rsos.221159,
  title = {Did AI get more negative recently?},
  author = {Dominik Beese and Begüm Altunbaş and Görkem Güzeler and Steffen Eger},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Royal Society Open Science},
  doi = {10.1098/rsos.221159},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221159}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Did AI get more negative recently?
AU  - Dominik Beese
AU  - Begüm Altunbaş
AU  - Görkem Güzeler
AU  - Steffen Eger
PY  - 2023
JO  - Royal Society Open Science
DO  - 10.1098/rsos.221159
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221159
ER  -

APA

Beese, D., Altunbaş, B., Güzeler, G., & Eger, S. (2023). Did AI get more negative recently?. Royal Society Open Science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221159

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T01:58:43.913Z