Evaluating the yaws diagnostic gap: a survey to determine the capacity of and barriers to improving diagnostics in all yaws-endemic countries
- DOI
- 10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669
- Published
- 2022-05-31
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 41/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669,
title = {Evaluating the yaws diagnostic gap: a survey to determine the capacity of and barriers to improving diagnostics in all yaws-endemic countries},
author = {Handley BL and Tchatchouang S and Grout L and Johnson RC and Tabah EN and Boua B and Boock AU and Koffi AP and Phanzu DM and Kotey NK and Rogers E and Dofitas B and Jung Y and Maweke T and Beiras CG and Maman I and Basing LA and Ngazoa S and Houezo JG and Togbey K and Telan EF and Sarmento N and Marion E and Addo KK and Mitjà O and Asideu K and Harding-Esch E and Marks M.},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluating the yaws diagnostic gap: a survey to determine the capacity of and barriers to improving diagnostics in all yaws-endemic countries AU - Handley BL AU - Tchatchouang S AU - Grout L AU - Johnson RC AU - Tabah EN AU - Boua B AU - Boock AU AU - Koffi AP AU - Phanzu DM AU - Kotey NK AU - Rogers E AU - Dofitas B AU - Jung Y AU - Maweke T AU - Beiras CG AU - Maman I AU - Basing LA AU - Ngazoa S AU - Houezo JG AU - Togbey K AU - Telan EF AU - Sarmento N AU - Marion E AU - Addo KK AU - Mitjà O AU - Asideu K AU - Harding-Esch E AU - Marks M. PY - 2022 DO - 10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669 UR - https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669 ER -
APA
BL, H., S, T., L, G., RC, J., EN, T., B, B., AU, B., AP, K., DM, P., NK, K., E, R., B, D., Y, J., T, M., CG, B., I, M., LA, B., S, N., JG, H., K, T., EF, T., N, S., E, M., KK, A., O, M., K, A., E, H., & M., M. (2022). Evaluating the yaws diagnostic gap: a survey to determine the capacity of and barriers to improving diagnostics in all yaws-endemic countries. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.22275669
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:49:07.210Z