‘Radical’ differences between two FLIM microscopes affect interpretation of cell signaling dynamics

Mukherjee S, Klarenbeek J, Oualid FE, Broek Bvd, Jalink K.

DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.18.553714
Published: 2023-08-19
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 39/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1101/2023.08.18.553714,
  title = {‘Radical’ differences between two FLIM microscopes affect interpretation of cell signaling dynamics},
  author = {Mukherjee S and  Klarenbeek J and  Oualid FE and  Broek Bvd and  Jalink K.},
  year = {2023},
  doi = {10.1101/2023.08.18.553714},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.18.553714}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ‘Radical’ differences between two FLIM microscopes affect interpretation of cell signaling dynamics
AU  - Mukherjee S
AU  -  Klarenbeek J
AU  -  Oualid FE
AU  -  Broek Bvd
AU  -  Jalink K.
PY  - 2023
DO  - 10.1101/2023.08.18.553714
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.18.553714
ER  -

APA

S, M., J, K., FE, O., Bvd, B., & K., J. (2023). ‘Radical’ differences between two FLIM microscopes affect interpretation of cell signaling dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.18.553714

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:26:55.573Z