Lessons learned from evaluating the NFDI4Health metadata schema for health studies using the Research Data Alliance’s FAIR data maturity model
- DOI
- 10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637
- Published
- 2025-09-28
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637,
title = {Lessons learned from evaluating the NFDI4Health metadata schema for health studies using the Research Data Alliance’s FAIR data maturity model},
author = {Elisa Kasbohm and Esther Thea Inau and Atinkut Alamirrew Zeleke and Kirubel Biruk Shiferaw and Haitham Abaza and Vera Clemens and Martin Golebiewski and Marisabel Gonzalez-Ocanto and Sophie A. I. Klopfenstein and Carina N. Vorisek and Dagmar Waltemath and Carsten Oliver Schmidt},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Lessons learned from evaluating the NFDI4Health metadata schema for health studies using the Research Data Alliance’s FAIR data maturity model AU - Elisa Kasbohm AU - Esther Thea Inau AU - Atinkut Alamirrew Zeleke AU - Kirubel Biruk Shiferaw AU - Haitham Abaza AU - Vera Clemens AU - Martin Golebiewski AU - Marisabel Gonzalez-Ocanto AU - Sophie A. I. Klopfenstein AU - Carina N. Vorisek AU - Dagmar Waltemath AU - Carsten Oliver Schmidt PY - 2025 DO - 10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637 UR - https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637 ER -
APA
Kasbohm, E., Inau, E. T., Zeleke, A. A., Shiferaw, K. B., Abaza, H., Clemens, V., Golebiewski, M., Gonzalez-Ocanto, M., Klopfenstein, S. A. I., Vorisek, C. N., Waltemath, D., & Schmidt, C. O. (2025). Lessons learned from evaluating the NFDI4Health metadata schema for health studies using the Research Data Alliance’s FAIR data maturity model. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.26.25336637
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:11:28.519Z