Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering
- DOI
- 10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714
- Published
- 2021-03-16
- Container
- Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714,
title = {Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering},
author = {Franck Taillandier and Cédric Baudrit and Claudio Carvajal and Benjamin Delhomme and Bruno Beullac},
year = {2021},
journal = {Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management},
doi = {10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering AU - Franck Taillandier AU - Cédric Baudrit AU - Claudio Carvajal AU - Benjamin Delhomme AU - Bruno Beullac PY - 2021 JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management DO - 10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714 UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714 ER -
APA
Taillandier, F., Baudrit, C., Carvajal, C., Delhomme, B., & Beullac, B. (2021). Imprecise abstract argumentation as a support for forensic engineering. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-09-2020-0714
Source records
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:29:25.874Z