Evaluation of the RCOG guideline for the prediction of neonates that are small for gestational age and comparison with the competing risks model.
- DOI
- 10.1111/1471-0528.16815
- Published
- 2021 Dec
- Container
- BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/1471-0528.16815,
title = {Evaluation of the RCOG guideline for the prediction of neonates that are small for gestational age and comparison with the competing risks model.},
author = {Papastefanou I and Nowacka U and Buerger O and Akolekar R and Wright D and Nicolaides KH},
year = {2021},
journal = {BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology},
doi = {10.1111/1471-0528.16815},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16815}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluation of the RCOG guideline for the prediction of neonates that are small for gestational age and comparison with the competing risks model. AU - Papastefanou I AU - Nowacka U AU - Buerger O AU - Akolekar R AU - Wright D AU - Nicolaides KH PY - 2021 JO - BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.16815 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16815 ER -
APA
I, P., U, N., O, B., R, A., D, W., & KH, N. (2021). Evaluation of the RCOG guideline for the prediction of neonates that are small for gestational age and comparison with the competing risks model.. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16815
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:31:19.870Z