Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II—Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus*

Nicole Richetelli, Lesley Hammer, Jacqueline A. Speir

Open source

DOI
10.1111/1556-4029.14551
Published
2020-09-17
Container
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/1556-4029.14551,
  title = {Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II—Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus*},
  author = {Nicole Richetelli and Lesley Hammer and Jacqueline A. Speir},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Journal of Forensic Sciences},
  doi = {10.1111/1556-4029.14551},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14551}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II—Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus*
AU  - Nicole Richetelli
AU  - Lesley Hammer
AU  - Jacqueline A. Speir
PY  - 2020
JO  - Journal of Forensic Sciences
DO  - 10.1111/1556-4029.14551
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14551
ER  - 

APA

Richetelli, N., Hammer, L., & Speir, J. A. (2020). Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II—Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus*. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14551

Source records