Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- DOI
- 10.1111/1755-5922.12260
- Published
- 2017 Jun
- Container
- Cardiovascular therapeutics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/1755-5922.12260,
title = {Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.},
author = {Sharma SP and Dahal K and Khatra J and Rosenfeld A and Lee J},
year = {2017},
journal = {Cardiovascular therapeutics},
doi = {10.1111/1755-5922.12260},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12260}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. AU - Sharma SP AU - Dahal K AU - Khatra J AU - Rosenfeld A AU - Lee J PY - 2017 JO - Cardiovascular therapeutics DO - 10.1111/1755-5922.12260 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12260 ER -
APA
SP, S., K, D., J, K., A, R., & J, L. (2017). Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Cardiovascular therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12260
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:58:29.215Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:58:29.232Z