Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) vs. Frozen Section in Lung Surgery: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Speed and Accuracy.

Ma H, Ke L, Chen Q, Wang Q, You Q, Feng S, Lv W, Hu J, Wang L

Open source

DOI
10.1111/1759-7714.70385
Published
2026 Sep
Container
Thoracic cancer
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/1759-7714.70385,
  title = {Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) vs. Frozen Section in Lung Surgery: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Speed and Accuracy.},
  author = {Ma H and Ke L and Chen Q and Wang Q and You Q and Feng S and Lv W and Hu J and Wang L},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Thoracic cancer},
  doi = {10.1111/1759-7714.70385},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70385}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) vs. Frozen Section in Lung Surgery: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Speed and Accuracy.
AU  - Ma H
AU  - Ke L
AU  - Chen Q
AU  - Wang Q
AU  - You Q
AU  - Feng S
AU  - Lv W
AU  - Hu J
AU  - Wang L
PY  - 2026
JO  - Thoracic cancer
DO  - 10.1111/1759-7714.70385
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70385
ER  - 

APA

H, M., L, K., Q, C., Q, W., Q, Y., S, F., W, L., J, H., & L, W. (2026). Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) vs. Frozen Section in Lung Surgery: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Speed and Accuracy.. Thoracic cancer. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70385

Source records