Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometriosis Does Not Differ Between Women Undergoing Their First Versus Any Subsequent Surgical Treatment
- DOI
- 10.1111/ajo.70171
- Published
- 2026-08
- Container
- Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/ajo.70171,
title = {Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometriosis Does Not Differ Between Women Undergoing Their First Versus Any Subsequent Surgical Treatment},
author = {Anais Alonso and Cecilia Ng and Rebecca Deans and Grant W. Montgomery and Gita D. Mishra and Erin Nesbitt‐Hawes and Jason A. Abbott},
year = {2026},
journal = {Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology},
doi = {10.1111/ajo.70171},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70171}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometriosis Does Not Differ Between Women Undergoing Their First Versus Any Subsequent Surgical Treatment AU - Anais Alonso AU - Cecilia Ng AU - Rebecca Deans AU - Grant W. Montgomery AU - Gita D. Mishra AU - Erin Nesbitt‐Hawes AU - Jason A. Abbott PY - 2026 JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology DO - 10.1111/ajo.70171 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70171 ER -
APA
Alonso, A., Ng, C., Deans, R., Montgomery, G. W., Mishra, G. D., Nesbitt‐Hawes, E., & Abbott, J. A. (2026). Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Endometriosis Does Not Differ Between Women Undergoing Their First Versus Any Subsequent Surgical Treatment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70171
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T10:58:35.757Z