A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low-cost mobile application versus higher-cost handheld 3D scanner for digital ear prosthetics.

Darbari Kaul R, Duong C, Ma J, Sayyar S, Wallace G, Dunn M, Cheng K, Fleming S, Whereat S, Clark J, Mukherjee P

Open source

DOI
10.1111/ans.19374
Published
2025 Apr
Container
ANZ journal of surgery
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/ans.19374,
  title = {A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low-cost mobile application versus higher-cost handheld 3D scanner for digital ear prosthetics.},
  author = {Darbari Kaul R and Duong C and Ma J and Sayyar S and Wallace G and Dunn M and Cheng K and Fleming S and Whereat S and Clark J and Mukherjee P},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {ANZ journal of surgery},
  doi = {10.1111/ans.19374},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19374}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low-cost mobile application versus higher-cost handheld 3D scanner for digital ear prosthetics.
AU  - Darbari Kaul R
AU  - Duong C
AU  - Ma J
AU  - Sayyar S
AU  - Wallace G
AU  - Dunn M
AU  - Cheng K
AU  - Fleming S
AU  - Whereat S
AU  - Clark J
AU  - Mukherjee P
PY  - 2025
JO  - ANZ journal of surgery
DO  - 10.1111/ans.19374
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19374
ER  - 

APA

R, D. K., C, D., J, M., S, S., G, W., M, D., K, C., S, F., S, W., J, C., & P, M. (2025). A comparison of the accuracy and feasibility of a low-cost mobile application versus higher-cost handheld 3D scanner for digital ear prosthetics.. ANZ journal of surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19374

Source records