Comparison of Hernia Repair Using Tissue Reinforcement With the Remaining Sac Versus Polypropylene Mesh in Patients With Indirect Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
- DOI
- 10.1111/ans.70900
- Published
- 2026 Sep 16
- Container
- ANZ journal of surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/ans.70900,
title = {Comparison of Hernia Repair Using Tissue Reinforcement With the Remaining Sac Versus Polypropylene Mesh in Patients With Indirect Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.},
author = {Ramezani I and Aliakbari M and Tahmasebi Ghorabi S and Behzadi A and Amiri B and Hadimaleki S and Ebrahimzadeh F and Sharifian M and Karimi Rouzbahani A},
year = {2026},
journal = {ANZ journal of surgery},
doi = {10.1111/ans.70900},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70900}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Hernia Repair Using Tissue Reinforcement With the Remaining Sac Versus Polypropylene Mesh in Patients With Indirect Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. AU - Ramezani I AU - Aliakbari M AU - Tahmasebi Ghorabi S AU - Behzadi A AU - Amiri B AU - Hadimaleki S AU - Ebrahimzadeh F AU - Sharifian M AU - Karimi Rouzbahani A PY - 2026 JO - ANZ journal of surgery DO - 10.1111/ans.70900 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70900 ER -
APA
I, R., M, A., S, T. G., A, B., B, A., S, H., F, E., M, S., & A, K. R. (2026). Comparison of Hernia Repair Using Tissue Reinforcement With the Remaining Sac Versus Polypropylene Mesh in Patients With Indirect Inguinal Hernia: A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.. ANZ journal of surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70900
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T21:33:08.726Z