Robotic‐ Versus Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Persistent Air Leak: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Alexander Lombardo, Angela Chen

Open source

DOI
10.1111/ans.70940
Published
2026-09-14
Container
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/ans.70940,
  title = {Robotic‐ Versus Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Persistent Air Leak: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis},
  author = {Alexander Lombardo and Angela Chen},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {ANZ Journal of Surgery},
  doi = {10.1111/ans.70940},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70940}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Robotic‐ Versus Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Persistent Air Leak: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
AU  - Alexander Lombardo
AU  - Angela Chen
PY  - 2026
JO  - ANZ Journal of Surgery
DO  - 10.1111/ans.70940
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70940
ER  - 

APA

Lombardo, A., & Chen, A. (2026). Robotic‐ Versus Video‐Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy and Persistent Air Leak: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. ANZ Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70940

Source records