In hospital resource allocation conflicts between health goods and environmental goods, a relational, co‐benefits frame, rather than a dualistic, competing goods frame, is key

David G. Kirchhoffer, Bridget Pratt

Open source

DOI
10.1111/bioe.70002
Published
2025-06-08
Container
Bioethics
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/bioe.70002,
  title = {In hospital resource allocation conflicts between health goods and environmental goods, a relational, co‐benefits frame, rather than a dualistic, competing goods frame, is key},
  author = {David G. Kirchhoffer and Bridget Pratt},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Bioethics},
  doi = {10.1111/bioe.70002},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70002}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - In hospital resource allocation conflicts between health goods and environmental goods, a relational, co‐benefits frame, rather than a dualistic, competing goods frame, is key
AU  - David G. Kirchhoffer
AU  - Bridget Pratt
PY  - 2025
JO  - Bioethics
DO  - 10.1111/bioe.70002
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70002
ER  - 

APA

Kirchhoffer, D. G., & Pratt, B. (2025). In hospital resource allocation conflicts between health goods and environmental goods, a relational, co‐benefits frame, rather than a dualistic, competing goods frame, is key. Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70002

Source records