The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1111/bju.13439
- Published
- 2016 Jun
- Container
- BJU international
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/bju.13439,
title = {The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.},
author = {Berg KD and Thomsen FB and Nerstrøm C and Røder MA and Iversen P and Toft BG and Vainer B and Brasso K},
year = {2016},
journal = {BJU international},
doi = {10.1111/bju.13439},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13439}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis. AU - Berg KD AU - Thomsen FB AU - Nerstrøm C AU - Røder MA AU - Iversen P AU - Toft BG AU - Vainer B AU - Brasso K PY - 2016 JO - BJU international DO - 10.1111/bju.13439 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13439 ER -
APA
KD, B., FB, T., C, N., MA, R., P, I., BG, T., B, V., & K, B. (2016). The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.. BJU international. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13439
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:11:34.978Z