A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
- DOI
- 10.1111/bmsp.12101
- Published
- 2017 May
- Container
- The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/bmsp.12101,
title = {A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.},
author = {van Rijn PW and Ali US},
year = {2017},
journal = {The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology},
doi = {10.1111/bmsp.12101},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12101}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing. AU - van Rijn PW AU - Ali US PY - 2017 JO - The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology DO - 10.1111/bmsp.12101 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12101 ER -
APA
PW, V. R., & US, A. (2017). A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.. The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12101
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:09:36.897Z