EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.

Bertram MG, Ågerstrand M, Thoré ESJ, Allen J, Balshine S, Brand JA, Brooks BW, Dang Z, Duquesne S, Ford AT, Hoffmann F, Hollert H, Jacob S, Kloas W, Klüver N, Lazorchak J, Ledesma M, Maack G, Macartney EL, Martin JM, Melvin SD, Michelangeli M, Mohr S, Padilla S, Pyle G, Saaristo M, Sahm R, Smit E, Steevens JA, van den Berg S, Vossen LE, Wlodkowic D, Wong BBM, Ziegler M, Brodin T

Open source

DOI: 10.1111/brv.13154
Published: 2025 Apr
Container: Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/brv.13154,
  title = {EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.},
  author = {Bertram MG and Ågerstrand M and Thoré ESJ and Allen J and Balshine S and Brand JA and Brooks BW and Dang Z and Duquesne S and Ford AT and Hoffmann F and Hollert H and Jacob S and Kloas W and Klüver N and Lazorchak J and Ledesma M and Maack G and Macartney EL and Martin JM and Melvin SD and Michelangeli M and Mohr S and Padilla S and Pyle G and Saaristo M and Sahm R and Smit E and Steevens JA and van den Berg S and Vossen LE and Wlodkowic D and Wong BBM and Ziegler M and Brodin T},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society},
  doi = {10.1111/brv.13154},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13154}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.
AU  - Bertram MG
AU  - Ågerstrand M
AU  - Thoré ESJ
AU  - Allen J
AU  - Balshine S
AU  - Brand JA
AU  - Brooks BW
AU  - Dang Z
AU  - Duquesne S
AU  - Ford AT
AU  - Hoffmann F
AU  - Hollert H
AU  - Jacob S
AU  - Kloas W
AU  - Klüver N
AU  - Lazorchak J
AU  - Ledesma M
AU  - Maack G
AU  - Macartney EL
AU  - Martin JM
AU  - Melvin SD
AU  - Michelangeli M
AU  - Mohr S
AU  - Padilla S
AU  - Pyle G
AU  - Saaristo M
AU  - Sahm R
AU  - Smit E
AU  - Steevens JA
AU  - van den Berg S
AU  - Vossen LE
AU  - Wlodkowic D
AU  - Wong BBM
AU  - Ziegler M
AU  - Brodin T
PY  - 2025
JO  - Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
DO  - 10.1111/brv.13154
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13154
ER  -

APA

MG, B., M, Å., ESJ, T., J, A., S, B., JA, B., BW, B., Z, D., S, D., AT, F., F, H., H, H., S, J., W, K., N, K., J, L., M, L., G, M., EL, M., JM, M., SD, M., M, M., S, M., S, P., G, P., M, S., R, S., E, S., JA, S., S, V. D. B., LE, V., D, W., BBM, W., M, Z., & T, B. (2025). EthoCRED: a framework to guide reporting and evaluation of the relevance and reliability of behavioural ecotoxicity studies.. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13154

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T12:42:19.999Z