A practical guide to characterising ecological coexistence.

Clark AT, Shoemaker LG, Arnoldi JF, Barabás G, Germain R, Godoy O, Hallett L, Karakoç C, Saavedra S, Schreiber SJ

DOI: 10.1111/brv.70079
Published: 2026 Feb
Container: Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/brv.70079,
  title = {A practical guide to characterising ecological coexistence.},
  author = {Clark AT and Shoemaker LG and Arnoldi JF and Barabás G and Germain R and Godoy O and Hallett L and Karakoç C and Saavedra S and Schreiber SJ},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society},
  doi = {10.1111/brv.70079},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70079}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A practical guide to characterising ecological coexistence.
AU  - Clark AT
AU  - Shoemaker LG
AU  - Arnoldi JF
AU  - Barabás G
AU  - Germain R
AU  - Godoy O
AU  - Hallett L
AU  - Karakoç C
AU  - Saavedra S
AU  - Schreiber SJ
PY  - 2026
JO  - Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
DO  - 10.1111/brv.70079
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70079
ER  -

APA

AT, C., LG, S., JF, A., G, B., R, G., O, G., L, H., C, K., S, S., & SJ, S. (2026). A practical guide to characterising ecological coexistence.. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70079

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T09:17:47.827Z