Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Pachiou A, Singh R, Jung RE, Balmer M, Benic GI, Ioannidis A

Open source

DOI
10.1111/clr.70160
Published
2026 Aug 21
Container
Clinical oral implants research
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/clr.70160,
  title = {Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.},
  author = {Pachiou A and Singh R and Jung RE and Balmer M and Benic GI and Ioannidis A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Clinical oral implants research},
  doi = {10.1111/clr.70160},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70160}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
AU  - Pachiou A
AU  - Singh R
AU  - Jung RE
AU  - Balmer M
AU  - Benic GI
AU  - Ioannidis A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Clinical oral implants research
DO  - 10.1111/clr.70160
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70160
ER  - 

APA

A, P., R, S., RE, J., M, B., GI, B., & A, I. (2026). Monolithic Zirconia Versus Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Posterior Region: 3-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.. Clinical oral implants research. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70160

Source records