Observer coverage and interaction rates determine the choice between design-based and machine learning bycatch estimators for rare species.
- DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.70374
- Published
- 2026 Aug 19
- Container
- Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/cobi.70374,
title = {Observer coverage and interaction rates determine the choice between design-based and machine learning bycatch estimators for rare species.},
author = {Long C and Ahrens R and Jones TT and Siders Z},
year = {2026},
journal = {Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology},
doi = {10.1111/cobi.70374},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70374}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Observer coverage and interaction rates determine the choice between design-based and machine learning bycatch estimators for rare species. AU - Long C AU - Ahrens R AU - Jones TT AU - Siders Z PY - 2026 JO - Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology DO - 10.1111/cobi.70374 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70374 ER -
APA
C, L., R, A., TT, J., & Z, S. (2026). Observer coverage and interaction rates determine the choice between design-based and machine learning bycatch estimators for rare species.. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70374
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:04:10.562Z