Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: Can colonic pull‐through delayed coloanal anastomosis avoid the need for definitive stoma? An experience of 28 consecutives cases

Marc Blondeau, Camélia Labiad, Dan Melka, Charles de Ponthaud, Massimo Giacca, Marie Monsinjon, Yves Panis

Open source

DOI
10.1111/codi.16124
Published
2022-04-06
Container
Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/codi.16124,
  title = {Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: Can colonic pull‐through delayed coloanal anastomosis avoid the need for definitive stoma? An experience of 28 consecutives cases},
  author = {Marc Blondeau and Camélia Labiad and Dan Melka and Charles de Ponthaud and Massimo Giacca and Marie Monsinjon and Yves Panis},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Colorectal Disease},
  doi = {10.1111/codi.16124},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16124}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: Can colonic pull‐through delayed coloanal anastomosis avoid the need for definitive stoma? An experience of 28 consecutives cases
AU  - Marc Blondeau
AU  - Camélia Labiad
AU  - Dan Melka
AU  - Charles de Ponthaud
AU  - Massimo Giacca
AU  - Marie Monsinjon
AU  - Yves Panis
PY  - 2022
JO  - Colorectal Disease
DO  - 10.1111/codi.16124
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16124
ER  - 

APA

Blondeau, M., Labiad, C., Melka, D., Ponthaud, C. D., Giacca, M., Monsinjon, M., & Panis, Y. (2022). Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: Can colonic pull‐through delayed coloanal anastomosis avoid the need for definitive stoma? An experience of 28 consecutives cases. Colorectal Disease. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16124

Source records