Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction.
- DOI
- 10.1111/cpf.12720
- Published
- 2021 Sep
- Container
- Clinical physiology and functional imaging
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/cpf.12720,
title = {Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction.},
author = {Hill EC and Housh TJ and Smith CM and Keller JL and Anders JPV and Schmidt RJ and Johnson GO},
year = {2021},
journal = {Clinical physiology and functional imaging},
doi = {10.1111/cpf.12720},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12720}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction. AU - Hill EC AU - Housh TJ AU - Smith CM AU - Keller JL AU - Anders JPV AU - Schmidt RJ AU - Johnson GO PY - 2021 JO - Clinical physiology and functional imaging DO - 10.1111/cpf.12720 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12720 ER -
APA
EC, H., TJ, H., CM, S., JL, K., JPV, A., RJ, S., & GO, J. (2021). Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction.. Clinical physiology and functional imaging. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12720
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:08:15.377Z