Cost-effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin A versus surgery for drooling: a randomized clinical trial.
- DOI
- 10.1111/dmcn.14636
- Published
- 2020 Nov
- Container
- Developmental medicine and child neurology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/dmcn.14636,
title = {Cost-effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin A versus surgery for drooling: a randomized clinical trial.},
author = {Bekkers S and van Ulsen KJ and M M Adang E and R T Scheffer A and J A van den Hoogen F},
year = {2020},
journal = {Developmental medicine and child neurology},
doi = {10.1111/dmcn.14636},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14636}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cost-effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin A versus surgery for drooling: a randomized clinical trial. AU - Bekkers S AU - van Ulsen KJ AU - M M Adang E AU - R T Scheffer A AU - J A van den Hoogen F PY - 2020 JO - Developmental medicine and child neurology DO - 10.1111/dmcn.14636 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14636 ER -
APA
S, B., KJ, V. U., E, M. M. A., A, R. T. S., & F, J. A. V. D. H. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin A versus surgery for drooling: a randomized clinical trial.. Developmental medicine and child neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14636
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:54:17.435Z