Visual steatosis assessment: method-dependent variation and systematically higher estimates compared with AI measurement.

Nazli S, Shaaban A, Patil A, Smith L, Stetzik L, Hasan B, Elhalaby R, DaCosta A, Sivasubramaniam P, Park BU, Krishna M, Salomao M, Pai R, Smith M, Allende D, Hartley CP, Lee HE, Chen ZE, Matkowskyj KA, Graham RP, Moreira RK

Open source

DOI: 10.1111/his.70272
Published: 2026 Sep 4
Container: Histopathology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/his.70272,
  title = {Visual steatosis assessment: method-dependent variation and systematically higher estimates compared with AI measurement.},
  author = {Nazli S and Shaaban A and Patil A and Smith L and Stetzik L and Hasan B and Elhalaby R and DaCosta A and Sivasubramaniam P and Park BU and Krishna M and Salomao M and Pai R and Smith M and Allende D and Hartley CP and Lee HE and Chen ZE and Matkowskyj KA and Graham RP and Moreira RK},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Histopathology},
  doi = {10.1111/his.70272},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70272}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Visual steatosis assessment: method-dependent variation and systematically higher estimates compared with AI measurement.
AU  - Nazli S
AU  - Shaaban A
AU  - Patil A
AU  - Smith L
AU  - Stetzik L
AU  - Hasan B
AU  - Elhalaby R
AU  - DaCosta A
AU  - Sivasubramaniam P
AU  - Park BU
AU  - Krishna M
AU  - Salomao M
AU  - Pai R
AU  - Smith M
AU  - Allende D
AU  - Hartley CP
AU  - Lee HE
AU  - Chen ZE
AU  - Matkowskyj KA
AU  - Graham RP
AU  - Moreira RK
PY  - 2026
JO  - Histopathology
DO  - 10.1111/his.70272
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70272
ER  -

APA

S, N., A, S., A, P., L, S., L, S., B, H., R, E., A, D., P, S., BU, P., M, K., M, S., R, P., M, S., D, A., CP, H., HE, L., ZE, C., KA, M., RP, G., & RK, M. (2026). Visual steatosis assessment: method-dependent variation and systematically higher estimates compared with AI measurement.. Histopathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.70272

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T16:18:47.182Z