RETRACTED: Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta-analysis.

Chen Y, Yu W, Jiang Y, Gao J, Xie D, Yu J, Li W, Liu Z, Xiong J

Open source

DOI
10.1111/iwj.14396
Published
2024 Feb
Container
International wound journal
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/iwj.14396,
  title = {RETRACTED: Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta-analysis.},
  author = {Chen Y and Yu W and Jiang Y and Gao J and Xie D and Yu J and Li W and Liu Z and Xiong J},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {International wound journal},
  doi = {10.1111/iwj.14396},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14396}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - RETRACTED: Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta-analysis.
AU  - Chen Y
AU  - Yu W
AU  - Jiang Y
AU  - Gao J
AU  - Xie D
AU  - Yu J
AU  - Li W
AU  - Liu Z
AU  - Xiong J
PY  - 2024
JO  - International wound journal
DO  - 10.1111/iwj.14396
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14396
ER  - 

APA

Y, C., W, Y., Y, J., J, G., D, X., J, Y., W, L., Z, L., & J, X. (2024). RETRACTED: Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta-analysis.. International wound journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14396

Source records