Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.

Miao JJ, Luo YY, Wang CY, Li HX, Yu HX

DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14837
Published: 2024 Apr
Container: International wound journal
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 10/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/iwj.14837,
  title = {Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.},
  author = {Miao JJ and Luo YY and Wang CY and Li HX and Yu HX},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {International wound journal},
  doi = {10.1111/iwj.14837},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14837}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.
AU  - Miao JJ
AU  - Luo YY
AU  - Wang CY
AU  - Li HX
AU  - Yu HX
PY  - 2024
JO  - International wound journal
DO  - 10.1111/iwj.14837
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14837
ER  -

APA

JJ, M., YY, L., CY, W., HX, L., & HX, Y. (2024). Meta-analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section.. International wound journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14837

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T19:48:45.791Z