Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x
- Published
- 2012-05-22
- Container
- International Journal of Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x,
title = {Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science},
author = {Dominique Valentin and Sylvie Chollet and Maud Lelièvre and Hervé Abdi},
year = {2012},
journal = {International Journal of Food Science \& Technology},
doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science AU - Dominique Valentin AU - Sylvie Chollet AU - Maud Lelièvre AU - Hervé Abdi PY - 2012 JO - International Journal of Food Science & Technology DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x ER -
APA
Valentin, D., Chollet, S., Lelièvre, M., & Abdi, H. (2012). Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science. International Journal of Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:19:39.093Z