Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x
- Published
- 2012 Sep
- Container
- Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x,
title = {Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.},
author = {Siegenthaler E and Bochud Y and Bergamin P and Wurtz P},
year = {2012},
journal = {Ophthalmic \& physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)},
doi = {10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain. AU - Siegenthaler E AU - Bochud Y AU - Bergamin P AU - Wurtz P PY - 2012 JO - Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) DO - 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x ER -
APA
E, S., Y, B., P, B., & P, W. (2012). Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00928.x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:52:26.228Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:52:26.222Z