Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics

Min Ji Kim, Jiyeon Choi

Open source

DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17557
Published: 2024-12-22
Container: Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher: Wiley
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/jocn.17557,
  title = {Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics},
  author = {Min Ji Kim and Jiyeon Choi},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Nursing},
  doi = {10.1111/jocn.17557},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17557}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics
AU  - Min Ji Kim
AU  - Jiyeon Choi
PY  - 2024
JO  - Journal of Clinical Nursing
DO  - 10.1111/jocn.17557
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17557
ER  -

APA

Kim, M. J., & Choi, J. (2024). Global Comparison of Codes of Ethics for Nurses: A Mixed‐Method Collective Case Study Differentiating Aspirational and Mandatory Ethics. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17557

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:13:51.909Z