Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial.

Husain S, Husain S, Izhar R

DOI: 10.1111/jog.13354
Published: 2017 Aug
Container: The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 8/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
serious concernRetraction Watch retraction: 1 retraction notice matched this DOI. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/jog.13354,
  title = {Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial.},
  author = {Husain S and Husain S and Izhar R},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research},
  doi = {10.1111/jog.13354},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13354}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial.
AU  - Husain S
AU  - Husain S
AU  - Izhar R
PY  - 2017
JO  - The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
DO  - 10.1111/jog.13354
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13354
ER  -

APA

S, H., S, H., & R, I. (2017). Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial.. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13354

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T18:47:16.245Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-24T18:47:16.264Z