Dinoprostone Versus Balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Raneen Abu Shqara, Ruba Maklade, Lilian Haj, Nadir Ganem, Lior Lowenstein, Maya Frank Wolf

Open source

DOI
10.1111/jog.70552
Published
2026-11
Container
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1111/jog.70552,
  title = {Dinoprostone Versus Balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study},
  author = {Raneen Abu Shqara and Ruba Maklade and Lilian Haj and Nadir Ganem and Lior Lowenstein and Maya Frank Wolf},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research},
  doi = {10.1111/jog.70552},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70552}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dinoprostone Versus Balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study
AU  - Raneen Abu Shqara
AU  - Ruba Maklade
AU  - Lilian Haj
AU  - Nadir Ganem
AU  - Lior Lowenstein
AU  - Maya Frank Wolf
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
DO  - 10.1111/jog.70552
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70552
ER  - 

APA

Shqara, R. A., Maklade, R., Haj, L., Ganem, N., Lowenstein, L., & Wolf, M. F. (2026). Dinoprostone Versus Balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70552

Source records