Comparative trueness of complete-arch implant position acquisition using auxiliary geometric device-aided and noncalibrated scanbody-based intraoral scanning versus smartphone-based and dedicated extraoral photogrammetry.
- DOI
- 10.1111/jopr.70244
- Published
- 2026 Sep 24
- Container
- Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/jopr.70244,
title = {Comparative trueness of complete-arch implant position acquisition using auxiliary geometric device-aided and noncalibrated scanbody-based intraoral scanning versus smartphone-based and dedicated extraoral photogrammetry.},
author = {Omar MS and Lan YH and Nagai T and Yang CC and Lin WS},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists},
doi = {10.1111/jopr.70244},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70244}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative trueness of complete-arch implant position acquisition using auxiliary geometric device-aided and noncalibrated scanbody-based intraoral scanning versus smartphone-based and dedicated extraoral photogrammetry. AU - Omar MS AU - Lan YH AU - Nagai T AU - Yang CC AU - Lin WS PY - 2026 JO - Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists DO - 10.1111/jopr.70244 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70244 ER -
APA
MS, O., YH, L., T, N., CC, Y., & WS, L. (2026). Comparative trueness of complete-arch implant position acquisition using auxiliary geometric device-aided and noncalibrated scanbody-based intraoral scanning versus smartphone-based and dedicated extraoral photogrammetry.. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70244
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:09:52.435Z