Accuracy of HAS-BLED and other bleeding risk assessment tools in predicting major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1111/jth.14692
- Published
- 2020 Apr
- Container
- Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1111/jth.14692,
title = {Accuracy of HAS-BLED and other bleeding risk assessment tools in predicting major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis.},
author = {Chang G and Xie Q and Ma L and Hu K and Zhang Z and Mu G and Cui Y},
year = {2020},
journal = {Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH},
doi = {10.1111/jth.14692},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14692}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Accuracy of HAS-BLED and other bleeding risk assessment tools in predicting major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis. AU - Chang G AU - Xie Q AU - Ma L AU - Hu K AU - Zhang Z AU - Mu G AU - Cui Y PY - 2020 JO - Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH DO - 10.1111/jth.14692 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14692 ER -
APA
G, C., Q, X., L, M., K, H., Z, Z., G, M., & Y, C. (2020). Accuracy of HAS-BLED and other bleeding risk assessment tools in predicting major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation: A network meta-analysis.. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14692
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:28:55.208Z